Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 3959 for davie.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 3959 for davie.
[PDF]
Racine County Human Services Department v. Frank W.
case is the best interests of the child. Davis S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149, 507 N.W.2d 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7619 - 2017-09-19
case is the best interests of the child. Davis S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149, 507 N.W.2d 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7619 - 2017-09-19
Racine County Human Services Department v. Frank W.
. Davis S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149, 507 N.W.2d 94 (1993) (“The legislature and this court have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7619 - 2005-03-31
. Davis S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149, 507 N.W.2d 94 (1993) (“The legislature and this court have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7619 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Phillip B. Briski, Stephan E. Kuehn, Lonny Benbo, Craig L. Hull, Donald Cupery, Christopher Davis, Jon K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09
, Phillip B. Briski, Stephan E. Kuehn, Lonny Benbo, Craig L. Hull, Donald Cupery, Christopher Davis, Jon K
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2018AP2222-CR 2 ¶1 BRENNAN, J.1 Dominique M. Anwar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242461 - 2019-06-25
DAVIS, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2018AP2222-CR 2 ¶1 BRENNAN, J.1 Dominique M. Anwar
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242461 - 2019-06-25
[PDF]
Timara Young v. Dusan Matic
-DOMESTIC CORPORATION, AND ARTHUR DAVIS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12025 - 2017-09-21
-DOMESTIC CORPORATION, AND ARTHUR DAVIS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Racine County Human Services Department v. Frank W.
case is the best interests of the child. Davis S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149, 507 N.W.2d 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7620 - 2017-09-19
case is the best interests of the child. Davis S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149, 507 N.W.2d 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7620 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DAVIS, JON K. PATZLSBERGER, TRISTA PITZEN, WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION OF CORRECTIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
DAVIS, JON K. PATZLSBERGER, TRISTA PITZEN, WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION OF CORRECTIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
juvenile age to trump all other sentencing considerations. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶19, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30295 - 2014-09-15
juvenile age to trump all other sentencing considerations. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶19, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30295 - 2014-09-15
Timara Young v. Dusan Matic
Management, Inc., a non-domestic corporation, and Arthur Davis, Defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12025 - 2005-03-31
Management, Inc., a non-domestic corporation, and Arthur Davis, Defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12025 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as requiring juvenile age to trump all other sentencing considerations. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30295 - 2007-09-18
as requiring juvenile age to trump all other sentencing considerations. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30295 - 2007-09-18