Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 3970 for davie.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 3970 for davie.
State v. Tyrone Davis Smith
, v. TYRONE DAVIS SMITH, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10365 - 2005-03-31
, v. TYRONE DAVIS SMITH, Defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10365 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
DAVIS, JON K. PATZLSBERGER, TRISTA PITZEN, WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION OF CORRECTIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
DAVIS, JON K. PATZLSBERGER, TRISTA PITZEN, WISCONSIN ASSOCIATION OF CORRECTIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
Racine County Human Services Department v. Frank W.
. Davis S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149, 507 N.W.2d 94 (1993) (“The legislature and this court have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7620 - 2005-03-31
. Davis S. v. Laura S., 179 Wis. 2d 114, 149, 507 N.W.2d 94 (1993) (“The legislature and this court have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7620 - 2005-03-31
Anthony Pratt v. Green Bay Correctional Institution
be dismissed simply for his failure to identify the necessary parties by name. See Davis v. Kelly, 160 F.3d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6503 - 2005-03-31
be dismissed simply for his failure to identify the necessary parties by name. See Davis v. Kelly, 160 F.3d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6503 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
as requiring juvenile age to trump all other sentencing considerations. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30295 - 2007-09-18
as requiring juvenile age to trump all other sentencing considerations. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30295 - 2007-09-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, C.J., Gundrum and Davis, JJ. Per curiam opinions may not be cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=272887 - 2020-08-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In State v. Davis, 2017 WI App 55, ¶9, 377 Wis. 2d 678, 901 N.W.2d 488, we held consistent with WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252653 - 2020-01-22
. In State v. Davis, 2017 WI App 55, ¶9, 377 Wis. 2d 678, 901 N.W.2d 488, we held consistent with WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252653 - 2020-01-22
[PDF]
Timara Young v. Dusan Matic
-DOMESTIC CORPORATION, AND ARTHUR DAVIS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12025 - 2017-09-21
-DOMESTIC CORPORATION, AND ARTHUR DAVIS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12025 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as recognized by Newman in his reply brief, this issue was resolved by Davis v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2419
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78531 - 2014-09-15
, as recognized by Newman in his reply brief, this issue was resolved by Davis v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2419
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78531 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
juvenile age to trump all other sentencing considerations. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶19, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30295 - 2014-09-15
juvenile age to trump all other sentencing considerations. See State v. Davis, 2005 WI App 98, ¶19, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30295 - 2014-09-15