Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 15478 for fee.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 15478 for fee.
[PDF]
Ethelyn I.C. v. Waukesha County
fees and costs associated with both petitions.1 Ethelyn’s appellate issues all relate to a dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12831 - 2017-09-21
fees and costs associated with both petitions.1 Ethelyn’s appellate issues all relate to a dispute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12831 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Rashid A. Osman v. Allen R. Phipps
, and attorney’s fees of $19,500.00. Enterprise argues that the circuit court erred in awarding: (1) interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3942 - 2017-09-20
, and attorney’s fees of $19,500.00. Enterprise argues that the circuit court erred in awarding: (1) interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3942 - 2017-09-20
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
for costs and attorney fees for defending against frivolous claims. We affirm. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11916 - 2005-03-31
for costs and attorney fees for defending against frivolous claims. We affirm. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11916 - 2005-03-31
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
for costs and attorney fees for defending against frivolous claims. We affirm. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12307 - 2005-03-31
for costs and attorney fees for defending against frivolous claims. We affirm. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12307 - 2005-03-31
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
for costs and attorney fees for defending against frivolous claims. We affirm. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12656 - 2005-03-31
for costs and attorney fees for defending against frivolous claims. We affirm. FACTS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, and we impose limitations on Hying’s future access to the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217080 - 2018-07-31
of reasonable costs and attorney’s fees, and we impose limitations on Hying’s future access to the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217080 - 2018-07-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
until they covered MDI's engagement fee of No. 2015AP1285-D 3 $1,295, plus 20 percent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203975 - 2017-11-28
until they covered MDI's engagement fee of No. 2015AP1285-D 3 $1,295, plus 20 percent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=203975 - 2017-11-28
WI App 50 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP2496-CR Complete Tit...
of Appeals held that South Carolina’s DNA “processing fee” was not intended to be punitive because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142164 - 2015-06-23
of Appeals held that South Carolina’s DNA “processing fee” was not intended to be punitive because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142164 - 2015-06-23
Frontsheet
14, 2007, Attorney Smead had failed to provide a refund of unearned fees to W.P. but stated he hoped
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46419 - 2010-01-26
14, 2007, Attorney Smead had failed to provide a refund of unearned fees to W.P. but stated he hoped
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46419 - 2010-01-26
2010 WI 4
14, 2007, Attorney Smead had failed to provide a refund of unearned fees to W.P. but stated he hoped
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46444 - 2010-01-26
14, 2007, Attorney Smead had failed to provide a refund of unearned fees to W.P. but stated he hoped
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46444 - 2010-01-26