Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 70081 for hi.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 70081 for hi.
State v. Willie J. Hickles
argues that trial counsel had been ineffective for, among other things, erroneously predicting his likely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14
argues that trial counsel had been ineffective for, among other things, erroneously predicting his likely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26217 - 2006-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment interpreting Wis. Stat. § 943.13 (2007-08)[1] and for personal injuries stemming from his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49115 - 2010-04-19
judgment interpreting Wis. Stat. § 943.13 (2007-08)[1] and for personal injuries stemming from his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49115 - 2010-04-19
State v. Mark Andrew Rea
as party to a crime. Rea argues that the admission of other acts evidence deprived him of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8110 - 2005-03-31
as party to a crime. Rea argues that the admission of other acts evidence deprived him of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8110 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Willie J. Hickles
been ineffective for, among other things, erroneously predicting his likely sentence, a prediction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26217 - 2017-09-21
been ineffective for, among other things, erroneously predicting his likely sentence, a prediction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26217 - 2017-09-21
State v. Alvin Braden
) and 961.573 (1999-2000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Braden claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4731 - 2005-03-31
) and 961.573 (1999-2000).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Braden claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4731 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin N. Dornbrook
from a judgment and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15176 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. The issue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15176 - 2017-09-21
Adam G. Hinton v. Allstate Insurance Company
. HOOVER, J. Adam Hinton appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial or, alternately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14456 - 2005-03-31
. HOOVER, J. Adam Hinton appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for a new trial or, alternately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14456 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darrin L. Britt
) that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his Alford plea because the State did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10224 - 2005-03-31
) that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his Alford plea because the State did not file
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10224 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to as “the Machner[1] court”) denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas on grounds of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06
to as “the Machner[1] court”) denying his motion to withdraw his guilty pleas on grounds of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83298 - 2012-06-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Court Judge Jeffrey C. Conen (hereinafter referred to as “the Machner1 court”) denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83298 - 2014-09-15
Court Judge Jeffrey C. Conen (hereinafter referred to as “the Machner1 court”) denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83298 - 2014-09-15