Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1151 - 1160 of 19862 for site:courtlistener.com/docket/ 1983 "(D. Ariz.)".

[PDF] Wayne L. Brewer v. Wendy Bruns
dismissing his complaint, based primarily on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against three employees of the Green Bay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8328 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
license, demanding relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The City moved to dismiss the amended complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31470 - 2008-01-09

Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
42 U.S.C. § 1983[1] for deprivation of constitutionally protected rights because Dasho's conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10261 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the 1981 injury, Mallett returned to Briggs & Stratton in May 1983, performing light duty work as a cam
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=537060 - 2022-07-07

[PDF] Thomas Hass v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals
from an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, but only if the denial turned on an issue of law. Id
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16469 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John Miller Carroll
Disciplinary Proceedings Against Charlton, 174 Wis. 2d 844, 498 N.W.2d 380 (1983). The court does
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16389 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
training Pretrial Program Commercial Docket Pilot Project Interpreter program Trust Account Overdraft
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=153&year=2009

Spencer McClain v. Jerry Smith, Jr.
is entitled to relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and on various state law grounds. We disagree and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4058 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Spencer McClain v. Jerry Smith, Jr.
dismissed his complaint because it shows he is entitled to relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and on various
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4058 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Randy J. Stahl
of restitution. ¶6 Circuit court docket entries show that a restitution hearing commenced on May 6, 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26339 - 2017-09-21