Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11501 - 11510 of 16506 for commentating.

[PDF] State v. Martin D. Triplett
the scene of a bank robbery lifted the individual’s shirt when he detected a bulge; commenting that “[a]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20168 - 2017-09-21

Paul R. Sharpley, Jr. v. Paul R. Sharpley III
talents; prescience is not one of them. ¶10 Furthermore, the legislative comment, which accompanies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4291 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
prior sentencing comments, the trial court believed that Hollimon’s failure to comply with the registry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42986 - 2009-11-10

COURT OF APPEALS
—Children 324A (comment). Because the dispositional order in this case was issued prior to that change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36301 - 2009-04-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the error was harmless.”). Thus, Agnello’s later comment that the trial court’s error in overruling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92203 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court was biased against him based on a comment made during the Machner hearing that Nancy appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=488683 - 2022-03-01

[PDF] Granville Rodgers v. City of Milwaukee
The circuit court commented that Rodgers “was clearly aware of the den[ia]l of his request,” but that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14508 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter A. Paget
did not directly comment on Paget's credibility. However, the referee acknowledged that the DOC log
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16552 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
601 (Ct. App. 1993) (“A prosecutor’s comment by questioning or argument about the shortcomings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211744 - 2018-04-25

La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey A.M.
of record’” (citation omitted)). ¶10 Moreover, comment j to § 27 of the Restatement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7008 - 2005-03-31