Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11501 - 11510 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 11501 - 11510 of 58510 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from the narcotics count. The latter count proceeded to trial, and the jury acquitted Cannon. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127185 - 2017-09-21
from the narcotics count. The latter count proceeded to trial, and the jury acquitted Cannon. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=127185 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brian P. Sullivan
to an evidentiary hearing on his motion and he asks that we remand to the trial court for that purpose. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
to an evidentiary hearing on his motion and he asks that we remand to the trial court for that purpose. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. B&B contends that the trial court erred with respect to its treatment of the trial exhibits and jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84546 - 2012-07-10
. B&B contends that the trial court erred with respect to its treatment of the trial exhibits and jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84546 - 2012-07-10
State v. Jamie L. Rabe
also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Rabe argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15149 - 2005-03-31
also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Rabe argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian P. Sullivan
remand to the trial court for that purpose. We conclude Sullivan is entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4228 - 2017-09-19
remand to the trial court for that purpose. We conclude Sullivan is entitled to an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4228 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 merits either a new trial or resentencing because the mother’s testimony about the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68845 - 2014-09-15
2 merits either a new trial or resentencing because the mother’s testimony about the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68845 - 2014-09-15
Jay Vercauteren v. Rainbow Insulators, Inc.
… a reasonable sum for expenses,” and he claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13850 - 2005-03-31
… a reasonable sum for expenses,” and he claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13850 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
is that when he was deciding whether to accept the State's plea offer or go to trial, the State, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130454 - 2014-11-25
is that when he was deciding whether to accept the State's plea offer or go to trial, the State, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130454 - 2014-11-25
[PDF]
Frontsheet
is that when he was deciding whether to accept the State's plea offer or go to trial, the State, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130454 - 2017-09-21
is that when he was deciding whether to accept the State's plea offer or go to trial, the State, the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=130454 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Kennedy
order denying his motion for a new trial. The issue is whether Kennedy is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8856 - 2017-09-19
order denying his motion for a new trial. The issue is whether Kennedy is entitled to a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8856 - 2017-09-19