Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11501 - 11510 of 20965 for word.
Search results 11501 - 11510 of 20965 for word.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the wording—she did not want to call attention to anything that was said. She ultimately asked the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69194 - 2014-09-15
with the wording—she did not want to call attention to anything that was said. She ultimately asked the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=69194 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Franciollo L. Jones
to the plain meaning of the words in the statute.” State v. Lombard, 2004 WI 95, ¶18, 273 Wis. 2d 538, 684
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7106 - 2017-09-20
to the plain meaning of the words in the statute.” State v. Lombard, 2004 WI 95, ¶18, 273 Wis. 2d 538, 684
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7106 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Derrick C. Evans
that, while the word "standing" is often employed to describe whether someone has a right to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8108 - 2017-09-19
that, while the word "standing" is often employed to describe whether someone has a right to object
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8108 - 2017-09-19
State v. Dion W. Demmerly
in the defendant's words what happened, and if there is no other recording of this or anything else
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11054 - 2005-03-31
in the defendant's words what happened, and if there is no other recording of this or anything else
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11054 - 2005-03-31
Charles Schroeder v. Linda Wacker
is clear and unambiguous. The general rule is that the word “shall” is presumed mandatory when it appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31
is clear and unambiguous. The general rule is that the word “shall” is presumed mandatory when it appears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31
State v. William K. Nord
in the implied consent statute should carry such a narrow, hypertechnical definition. The word merely refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2670 - 2005-03-31
in the implied consent statute should carry such a narrow, hypertechnical definition. The word merely refers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2670 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rule.” Id. In other words, when a defendant negotiates a plea bargain with the State and enters
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461543 - 2021-12-15
rule.” Id. In other words, when a defendant negotiates a plea bargain with the State and enters
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461543 - 2021-12-15
State v. Arturo Melendez
me if I would recommend the maximum, and I told him that I would not say the maximum. The word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31
me if I would recommend the maximum, and I told him that I would not say the maximum. The word
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12133 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
objection and prohibited the detective’s identification testimony. In other words, we assume, without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872275 - 2024-11-06
objection and prohibited the detective’s identification testimony. In other words, we assume, without
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=872275 - 2024-11-06
COURT OF APPEALS
ruling.” L.M.S. v. Atkinson, 2006 WI App 116, ¶19, 294 Wis. 2d 553, 718 N.W.2d 118. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30
ruling.” L.M.S. v. Atkinson, 2006 WI App 116, ¶19, 294 Wis. 2d 553, 718 N.W.2d 118. In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53880 - 2010-08-30