Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11511 - 11520 of 63539 for records.
Search results 11511 - 11520 of 63539 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
a sufficient record by demonstrating that the defendant has read and understood the plea questionnaire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
a sufficient record by demonstrating that the defendant has read and understood the plea questionnaire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
review of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135489 - 2015-02-24
review of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135489 - 2015-02-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106859 - 2017-09-21
review of the record, we 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106859 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416655 - 2021-09-01
has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416655 - 2021-09-01
COURT OF APPEALS
a “serious significant prior criminal record” and had committed a crime that was of an “opportunistic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15
a “serious significant prior criminal record” and had committed a crime that was of an “opportunistic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256287 - 2020-03-17
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256287 - 2020-03-17
James A. O'Connor v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
lacks standing to bring his motion. The record supports the trial court’s finding. Consequentially, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17645 - 2005-04-11
lacks standing to bring his motion. The record supports the trial court’s finding. Consequentially, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17645 - 2005-04-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123242 - 2017-09-21
and conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123242 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Order-SC
on August 20, 2014, see § (Rule) 809.64, Stats., and the record in this matter was remitted to the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125237 - 2017-09-21
on August 20, 2014, see § (Rule) 809.64, Stats., and the record in this matter was remitted to the circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759310 - 2024-02-08
as having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759310 - 2024-02-08