Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11521 - 11530 of 28858 for f.

COURT OF APPEALS
for Milwaukee County: Charles F. Kahn, jr. and Daniel L. Konkol, Judges. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40934 - 2009-09-16

State v. Joseph C.C.
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Sauk County: ROBERT F. CURTIN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9699 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Eric L. Tolonen
States v. Buljubasic, 808 F.2d 1260, 1263 (7th Cir. 1987) (emphasis in original). ¶8 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7363 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
was intended for Witak’s gratification, counsel stated: [I]f this were an allegation that a certain person
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91738 - 2013-01-14

Deborah K. Deforth v. Gary L. Deforth
as follows: Factors c, e, f, g, h, j and L [of Wis. Stat. § 767.255] are relatively neutral in character
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25547 - 2006-06-14

COURT OF APPEALS
: charles f. kahn, jr., Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30675 - 2007-10-22

State v. Michael Love
nom., Kuntz v. McCaughtry, 806 F. Supp. 1373 (E.D. Wis. 1992). Evidence may also be admitted under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8208 - 2006-01-24

[PDF] _WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
2018AP001650 CR State v. Antwon Laurel Jones 1 08-13-2019 Affirmed 2018AP001651 CR State v. Scott F
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248206 - 2019-10-04

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
discretion in determining if a new factor justifies sentence modification. Id., ¶37. “[I]f the court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93296 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. John S. Troyer
. Jones, 21 F.3d 165, 170 (7th Cir. 1994). In determining whether a person is in custody, we consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6437 - 2017-09-19