Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11521 - 11530 of 58557 for o j.
Search results 11521 - 11530 of 58557 for o j.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the State for the waiver, he answered “[n]o Your Honor, nothing that needs to be placed on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67344 - 2014-09-15
by the State for the waiver, he answered “[n]o Your Honor, nothing that needs to be placed on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67344 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. The estates disagree with Roger’s premise, pointing out that in the trial court, “[n]o party to this case ever
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123649 - 2014-10-19
. The estates disagree with Roger’s premise, pointing out that in the trial court, “[n]o party to this case ever
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123649 - 2014-10-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 375 (“[T]o establish that postconviction or appellate counsel was ineffective, a defendant bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89199 - 2014-09-15
, 375 (“[T]o establish that postconviction or appellate counsel was ineffective, a defendant bears
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89199 - 2014-09-15
State v. Lasko W. Jackson
is not required to commit false imprisonment and “[o]ne may be confined or restrained by acts or words or both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2228 - 2005-03-31
is not required to commit false imprisonment and “[o]ne may be confined or restrained by acts or words or both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2228 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
South Hamilton Madison, WI 53703 Timothy David Kiefer Kiefer Law Office LLC P. O. Box 1546
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102445 - 2017-09-21
South Hamilton Madison, WI 53703 Timothy David Kiefer Kiefer Law Office LLC P. O. Box 1546
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102445 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the pertinent portions of Judge Kessler’s analysis here: Contrary to Jevon’s implication … [n]o statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121736 - 2014-09-16
the pertinent portions of Judge Kessler’s analysis here: Contrary to Jevon’s implication … [n]o statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121736 - 2014-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
, Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Juneau County: Richard o. wright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
, Respondents. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Juneau County: Richard o. wright
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101602 - 2013-09-04
State v. Patricia Marie F-K.
. The trial court specifically addressed the adoption factor. It stated in pertinent part: [O]ne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15037 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court specifically addressed the adoption factor. It stated in pertinent part: [O]ne
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15037 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
next addresses the admissibility of Holly’s testimony that “[o]ne day, my sister, Heather, came to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106333 - 2017-09-21
next addresses the admissibility of Holly’s testimony that “[o]ne day, my sister, Heather, came to me
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106333 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with prosecution of a defendant); Romero-Perez v. Kentucky, 492 S.W.3d 902, 906 (Ky. Ct. App. 2016) (“[o]ne can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204764 - 2017-12-12
with prosecution of a defendant); Romero-Perez v. Kentucky, 492 S.W.3d 902, 906 (Ky. Ct. App. 2016) (“[o]ne can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204764 - 2017-12-12