Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11521 - 11530 of 12912 for prosecuting.
Search results 11521 - 11530 of 12912 for prosecuting.
State v. William E. Spaeth
of OWI offenses are prosecuted. Moreover, in contrast with § 973.12(1), the enhanced penalties under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17032 - 2005-03-31
of OWI offenses are prosecuted. Moreover, in contrast with § 973.12(1), the enhanced penalties under
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17032 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cory L. Horsfall
efforts to secure information in the possession of the prosecution and law enforcement authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4643 - 2005-03-31
efforts to secure information in the possession of the prosecution and law enforcement authorities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4643 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
(holding that the prosecution did not breach a plea agreement by asking the court to order restitution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163357 - 2017-09-21
(holding that the prosecution did not breach a plea agreement by asking the court to order restitution
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163357 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 464 (1996) (explaining in the context of a selective prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175518 - 2017-09-21
States v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 464 (1996) (explaining in the context of a selective prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175518 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Zan Morgan
Officer Whyte asked him about the blunt. ¶10 The prosecution may not use a defendant’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4281 - 2017-09-19
Officer Whyte asked him about the blunt. ¶10 The prosecution may not use a defendant’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4281 - 2017-09-19
State v. Robert A. Mendoza
to the personality of the State’s prosecution previously.”[2] Mendoza’s counsel objected to the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12303 - 2005-03-31
to the personality of the State’s prosecution previously.”[2] Mendoza’s counsel objected to the State’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12303 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Elmer W. Glaeske v. Elwyn M. Shaw
6 that the continued prosecution of Elwyn’s undue influence claim was frivolous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6918 - 2017-09-20
6 that the continued prosecution of Elwyn’s undue influence claim was frivolous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6918 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
the impact of expert testimony” and gave the prosecution “the benefits of expert testimony without having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86161 - 2012-08-15
the impact of expert testimony” and gave the prosecution “the benefits of expert testimony without having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86161 - 2012-08-15
[PDF]
State v. Jamie L. Pennington
degree of anxiety will always pervade a criminal prosecution. No judicial mandate, however, could ever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
degree of anxiety will always pervade a criminal prosecution. No judicial mandate, however, could ever
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5782 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kimberly B.
is privileged, although otherwise criminal, is a defense to prosecution for any crime based on that conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17981 - 2005-07-06
is privileged, although otherwise criminal, is a defense to prosecution for any crime based on that conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17981 - 2005-07-06