Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11521 - 11530 of 18724 for quote.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the criminal justice system.” Id., ¶46 (quoting State v. Dearborn, 2010 WI 84, ¶38, 327 Wis. 2d 252, 786 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=462785 - 2021-12-15

[PDF] NOTICE
.” Id. at 11 (quoting Quick v. Michigan Millers Mut. Ins. Co., 250 N.E.2d 819, 821 (Ill. App. 1969
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30095 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Susan K. Frenz v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
and quoted source omitted). A reviewing court must affirm the Department’s findings if there is any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12574 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 1, ¶10 (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 27). There is no need to reach the City’s alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181716 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Michael W. Gragg v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
.—Order affirmed. 5 For clarity, we quote from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3519 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(quoted source omitted). The defendant bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207493 - 2018-01-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence in Miller we quoted a Mississippi case, Liggins v. State, 726 So.2d 180, 183 (Miss. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81988 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. William R. Scott
is quoted above. Because Scott did not discuss the second and the third Solem factors, namely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3407 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of necessary facts. 7 Ostensibly quoting SCR 20:4.2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242826 - 2019-06-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
led to the prohibited result. See id. at 457 (quoted source omitted). We also reject King’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229897 - 2018-12-06