Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11521 - 11530 of 58509 for speedy trial.
Search results 11521 - 11530 of 58509 for speedy trial.
State v. Emmanuel O. Okoronta
is entitled to a new trial because his attorney erroneously used a peremptory strike to remove a biased juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
is entitled to a new trial because his attorney erroneously used a peremptory strike to remove a biased juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3101 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for a new trial under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2020AP515 2 (2019-20).1 Wilson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566472 - 2022-09-15
motion for a new trial under WIS. STAT. § 974.06 No. 2020AP515 2 (2019-20).1 Wilson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566472 - 2022-09-15
State v. Bryant U.
FINE, J. Bryant U. appeals from orders entered by the trial court terminating his parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17974 - 2005-05-02
FINE, J. Bryant U. appeals from orders entered by the trial court terminating his parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17974 - 2005-05-02
COURT OF APPEALS
, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d 574. In any event, he has not established that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42058 - 2009-10-13
, 281 Wis. 2d 157, 696 N.W.2d 574. In any event, he has not established that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42058 - 2009-10-13
State v. Richard A. Moeck
: Very well, ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the trial of the State of Wisconsin versus Richard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15048 - 2005-03-31
: Very well, ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the trial of the State of Wisconsin versus Richard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15048 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge certain “other acts” evidence. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169015 - 2017-09-21
that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge certain “other acts” evidence. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=169015 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bryant U.
FINE, J. Bryant U. appeals from orders entered by the trial court terminating his parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17973 - 2005-05-02
FINE, J. Bryant U. appeals from orders entered by the trial court terminating his parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17973 - 2005-05-02
State v. Brian P. Sullivan
to an evidentiary hearing on his motion and he asks that we remand to the trial court for that purpose. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
to an evidentiary hearing on his motion and he asks that we remand to the trial court for that purpose. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4228 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. B&B contends that the trial court erred with respect to its treatment of the trial exhibits and jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84546 - 2012-07-10
. B&B contends that the trial court erred with respect to its treatment of the trial exhibits and jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84546 - 2012-07-10
State v. Jamie L. Rabe
also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Rabe argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15149 - 2005-03-31
also appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Rabe argues he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15149 - 2005-03-31