Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11531 - 11540 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 11531 - 11540 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
to be need for residential care and custody due to the developmental disability of [Barbara B.]; that based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29349 - 2014-09-15
to be need for residential care and custody due to the developmental disability of [Barbara B.]; that based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29349 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Douglas argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357928 - 2021-04-20
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Douglas argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=357928 - 2021-04-20
[PDF]
WI 83
. The circuit court denied the motion, and a jury convicted Artic of one count of No. 2008AP880-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52199 - 2014-09-15
. The circuit court denied the motion, and a jury convicted Artic of one count of No. 2008AP880-CR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52199 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
2023AP001399 - Initial Brief of Governor
In re Constitutionality of House Joint Resolution 25E, 863 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 2003
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1016initialbriefgovernor.pdf - 2023-10-16
In re Constitutionality of House Joint Resolution 25E, 863 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 2003
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_1016initialbriefgovernor.pdf - 2023-10-16
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court - Calendar and case synopsis - November 2022
to state a claim. The circuit court granted U.W. Health’s motion to dismiss the complaint. The circuit
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsnov2022.pdf - 2022-11-23
to state a claim. The circuit court granted U.W. Health’s motion to dismiss the complaint. The circuit
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oralargcasesynopsnov2022.pdf - 2022-11-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; and an alleged due process violation based on the mislabeling of the State’s motion in limine. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616446 - 2023-01-31
; and an alleged due process violation based on the mislabeling of the State’s motion in limine. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616446 - 2023-01-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, “the judicial defendants”). Newson also appeals an order that: (1) denied his motion for a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654684 - 2023-05-09
, “the judicial defendants”). Newson also appeals an order that: (1) denied his motion for a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654684 - 2023-05-09
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Anderson
jumping. (1) Whoever, having been released from custody under ch. 969, intentionally fails to comply
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17082 - 2017-09-21
jumping. (1) Whoever, having been released from custody under ch. 969, intentionally fails to comply
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17082 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Anderson
jumping. (1) Whoever, having been released from custody under ch. 969, intentionally fails to comply
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17083 - 2017-09-21
jumping. (1) Whoever, having been released from custody under ch. 969, intentionally fails to comply
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17083 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
the State’s motion, ruling that: Mr. Gray will be allowed to testify based upon things that he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30943 - 2014-09-15
the State’s motion, ruling that: Mr. Gray will be allowed to testify based upon things that he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30943 - 2014-09-15