Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11541 - 11550 of 60809 for affidavit of service form.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, Falls wanted to file a postconviction motion, counsel should file a supplemental report or affidavit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107415 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Candace I. Sedgwick v. Dawn L. Volenec
was accompanied by an affidavit of defendants’ counsel. He averred that plaintiffs’ counsel had sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4955 - 2017-09-19

Candace I. Sedgwick v. Dawn L. Volenec
production of the diary during discovery. The motion was accompanied by an affidavit of defendants’ counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4955 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
a supplemental no-merit report, including an affidavit, advising whether White wanted to file a postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112472 - 2014-05-20

Ray Omernick v. Pat Peckham
in an affidavit that was submitted in the initial case. Peckham moved to dismiss the suit on the basis of claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26111 - 2006-08-07

Jerome G. Mueller v. Roger M. James
by Jerome Mueller.[1] The trial court ruled that James's answer and affidavit create a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10846 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. The conviction stems from his conduct toward a Walworth County Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55391 - 2010-10-12

[PDF] NOTICE
and Human Services (DHHS) case manager. Cruz argues that the trial court erred when it admitted evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55391 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Michael L. Piaskowski
was not met: Quite frankly, the testimony and affidavits submitted both in support of and in denial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12768 - 2017-09-21

State v. Michael L. Piaskowski
and affidavits submitted both in support of and in denial of defense's present contentions might be described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12768 - 2005-03-31