Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11541 - 11550 of 69592 for as he.
Search results 11541 - 11550 of 69592 for as he.
CA Blank Order
sentence modification. He also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111763 - 2014-05-01
sentence modification. He also appeals the order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111763 - 2014-05-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as Sagen awoke. Wojcik testified that he believed that Sagen might be under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036000 - 2025-11-11
as Sagen awoke. Wojcik testified that he believed that Sagen might be under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036000 - 2025-11-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
affirm the judgment. A confidential informant (CI) recorded two transactions in which he bought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201548 - 2017-11-15
affirm the judgment. A confidential informant (CI) recorded two transactions in which he bought
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201548 - 2017-11-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to WIS. STAT. §§ 813.12(4), (8)(a), and 939.62(1)(a). He argues that the trial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042669 - 2025-11-26
to WIS. STAT. §§ 813.12(4), (8)(a), and 939.62(1)(a). He argues that the trial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042669 - 2025-11-26
State v. Steven B. Post
. He raises numerous issues. We affirm. ¶2 Pursuant to Alford and no-contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16145 - 2005-03-31
. He raises numerous issues. We affirm. ¶2 Pursuant to Alford and no-contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16145 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
witness at the motion hearing. Nye testified that on February 15, 2009, at approximately 2:32 a.m., he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56705 - 2010-11-16
witness at the motion hearing. Nye testified that on February 15, 2009, at approximately 2:32 a.m., he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56705 - 2010-11-16
State v. Bryant E. Carter
to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225(3m) and 947.01 (1999-2000).[1] He raises three issues: (1) whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4960 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. §§ 940.225(3m) and 947.01 (1999-2000).[1] He raises three issues: (1) whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4960 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David W. Oakley
to the withdrawal of a previous plea agreement and a condition of probation. He also alleges that a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16335 - 2017-09-21
to the withdrawal of a previous plea agreement and a condition of probation. He also alleges that a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16335 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
-CR 2 ¶2 Smith was sentenced on three counts of burglary. On two of the counts he was given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30650 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 ¶2 Smith was sentenced on three counts of burglary. On two of the counts he was given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30650 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jonathan R. Blount
-degree sexual assault of a child, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8730 - 2005-03-31
-degree sexual assault of a child, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8730 - 2005-03-31