Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11541 - 11550 of 30164 for de.

[PDF] NOTICE
requires us to interpret statutes and regulations, a question of law that we review de novo. E.S. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33086 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. See State v. Balliette, 2011 WI 79, ¶18, 336 Wis. 2d 358, 805 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131977 - 2017-09-21

State v. Kevin D.K.
a party has met the required burden of proof, is a question of law, which the appellate court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3990 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
), STATS. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law which we review de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8266 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
findings unless they are clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212401 - 2018-05-09

The Lakefront Neighborhood Coalition v. City of Milwaukee
that this court reviews de novo. Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp., 226 Wis. 2d 235, 245, 593 N.W.2d 445
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4405 - 2005-03-31

Village of Jackson v. Richard P. Hamann, Jr.
to the circuit court and sought and received a trial de novo. In that forum, Hamann brought a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11194 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
clearly erroneous. Id. Application of constitutional principles to these facts is de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110026 - 2014-04-08

Hershel E. Hooven v. Truck Country of Wisconsin
review the trial court’s summary judgment ruling de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12822 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] M&I Bank of Southern Wisconsin v. Robert F. Lins
against Edith and prevailed. Edith appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review summary judgment decisions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6751 - 2017-09-20