Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11551 - 11560 of 30032 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
of Delafield, 191 Wis. 2d 586, 595, 530 N.W.2d 16 (Ct. App. 1995). Our de novo review persuades us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97905 - 2013-06-10

[PDF] State v. Eesi Vang
, however, is a question of law reviewed de novo. See LeQue, 150 Wis.2d at 262, 442 N.W.2d at 497
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11477 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an investigatory stop meets constitutional and statutory standards is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140534 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph G.
in the restitution order is a question of law which we review de novo. See R.W.S. v. State, 162 Wis.2d 862, 869, 471
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13133 - 2005-08-31

State v. Michael Morris
. The application of law to undisputed facts presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13251 - 2005-03-31

City of Madison v. Carl J. Bock
this court reviews de novo. Baldwin, 212 Wis.2d at 254-55, 569 N.W.2d at 41. Furthermore, if evidence has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13109 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor is a question of law, decided by this court de novo. State v. Ralph, 156 Wis. 2d 433, 436
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33050 - 2008-06-16

COURT OF APPEALS
is frivolous is a question of law that we review de novo. See Brunson v. Ward, 2001 WI 89, ¶27, 245 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101402 - 2013-08-28

Bank One v. Linda L. Harris
that was published. This is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. DILHR, 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9147 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Barbara J. Chariton v. Saturn Corporation
of review is de novo. First, Saturn appeals the trial court’s denial of a summary judgment motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15224 - 2017-09-21