Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11551 - 11560 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] Patricia A. Andreshak v. Chris Childrey
of Great Divide Insurance Company.1 The trial court ruled that C&I failed to establish excusable neglect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11042 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that: (1) he was entitled to a trial on his discharge petition; and (2) the circuit court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393466 - 2021-07-20

Debra Plummer v. Duane Taylor
in a fire at a residence they rented from Taylor. The trial court ruled that Taylor was negligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11839 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
] Zawatzke challenges several of the trial court’s evidentiary decisions. We reject her arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88620 - 2012-10-30

Paul Kluth v. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
. The coverage issue was decided by the trial court after a jury trial on the liability and damages issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9381 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. David Womble
to withdraw that plea because he entered it involuntarily, and with ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11158 - 2017-09-19

State v. James D.B.
. has appealed from an order entered in the trial court on July 20, 1999, requiring him to pay $50 per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15914 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Robert Robinson v. City of Milwaukee
for Milwaukee County: M. JOSEPH DONALD, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 FINE, J. Robert Robinson appeals the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7343 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
denying her motions for a new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict after the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44481 - 2014-09-15

State v. Ben F. Oldakowski
that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13929 - 2005-03-31