Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11561 - 11570 of 63537 for records.
Search results 11561 - 11570 of 63537 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version. No. 2013AP663-CRNM 2 reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101731 - 2017-09-21
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version. No. 2013AP663-CRNM 2 reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101731 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069739 - 2026-01-27
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1069739 - 2026-01-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106859 - 2017-09-21
review of the record, we 1 All references
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106859 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
mitigating factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286826 - 2020-09-16
mitigating factors. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286826 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416655 - 2021-09-01
has not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416655 - 2021-09-01
COURT OF APPEALS
a “serious significant prior criminal record” and had committed a crime that was of an “opportunistic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15
a “serious significant prior criminal record” and had committed a crime that was of an “opportunistic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15
County of Milwaukee v. Ellen T. Roy
, however, that the discussions at the final pretrial were not on the record, stating: “[The County] told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13750 - 2005-03-31
, however, that the discussions at the final pretrial were not on the record, stating: “[The County] told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13750 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256287 - 2020-03-17
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256287 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 Record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725766 - 2023-11-08
-CRNM 2 Record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725766 - 2023-11-08
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94475 - 2013-03-26
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94475 - 2013-03-26