Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11571 - 11580 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 11571 - 11580 of 41672 for jury duty/1000.
State v. Kelley L. Hauk
, the circuit court’s authority to approve a stipulation, waiver of her right to a jury trial, and ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4096 - 2005-03-31
, the circuit court’s authority to approve a stipulation, waiver of her right to a jury trial, and ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4096 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kelley L. Hauk
, the circuit court’s authority to approve a stipulation, waiver of her right to a jury trial, and ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4097 - 2005-03-31
, the circuit court’s authority to approve a stipulation, waiver of her right to a jury trial, and ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4097 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Holly R. v. Joseph T.
his trial before a twelve-person jury, he did not withdraw his right to a jury trial within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2663 - 2017-09-19
his trial before a twelve-person jury, he did not withdraw his right to a jury trial within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2663 - 2017-09-19
Holly R. v. Joseph T.
trial before a twelve-person jury, he did not withdraw his right to a jury trial within the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31
trial before a twelve-person jury, he did not withdraw his right to a jury trial within the meaning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2663 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - April
confronted them. The jury convicted Moran on all counts. He is now serving a 72-year prison sentence
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917 - 2017-09-20
confronted them. The jury convicted Moran on all counts. He is now serving a 72-year prison sentence
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=917 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) and Noel’s parental rights (on an involuntary basis) (“TPR petitions”) were filed.2 A jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90931 - 2014-09-15
) and Noel’s parental rights (on an involuntary basis) (“TPR petitions”) were filed.2 A jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90931 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
orders. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2007, following a jury trial, Nichols was convicted of second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749277 - 2024-01-09
orders. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2007, following a jury trial, Nichols was convicted of second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749277 - 2024-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
petitions”) were filed.[2] A jury trial on the petitions was held, and, at the conclusion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90931 - 2012-12-26
petitions”) were filed.[2] A jury trial on the petitions was held, and, at the conclusion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90931 - 2012-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. was scheduled for a jury trial on December 12, 2016, on the grounds phase. That trial date was later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247248 - 2020-01-30
. was scheduled for a jury trial on December 12, 2016, on the grounds phase. That trial date was later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247248 - 2020-01-30
COURT OF APPEALS
. James Howard appeals from an amended judgment of conviction, entered after a jury found him guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106926 - 2014-01-21
. James Howard appeals from an amended judgment of conviction, entered after a jury found him guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106926 - 2014-01-21