Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11571 - 11580 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 11571 - 11580 of 40447 for probate forms/1000.
State v. James L. Wright
on the drug charge and consecutive probation on the obstruction charge.[3] At that time, the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5981 - 2005-03-31
on the drug charge and consecutive probation on the obstruction charge.[3] At that time, the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5981 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
improperly testified Luedtke was on probation and had been in prison. We reject Luedtke’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91612 - 2014-09-15
improperly testified Luedtke was on probation and had been in prison. We reject Luedtke’s arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91612 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 13, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cou...
the defense’s requests for probation because Rivas had not previously succeeded on probation and it “would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70793 - 2011-09-12
the defense’s requests for probation because Rivas had not previously succeeded on probation and it “would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70793 - 2011-09-12
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James M. DeGracie
. was convicted of a criminal offense in Jackson County Circuit Court and placed on probation; in 1999 W.O.'s
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16664 - 2017-09-21
. was convicted of a criminal offense in Jackson County Circuit Court and placed on probation; in 1999 W.O.'s
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16664 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defense’s requests for probation because Rivas had not previously succeeded on probation and it “would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70793 - 2014-09-15
the defense’s requests for probation because Rivas had not previously succeeded on probation and it “would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70793 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gary L. Parson
consecutively. However, the latter sentence was stayed in favor of a five-year consecutive probation period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11953 - 2017-09-21
consecutively. However, the latter sentence was stayed in favor of a five-year consecutive probation period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11953 - 2017-09-21
State v. Norman O. Brown
on the other counts in the Kohl’s case. The court imposed an additional sixteen-year term of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
on the other counts in the Kohl’s case. The court imposed an additional sixteen-year term of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12715 - 2005-03-31
State v. Vernon L. Fink
had his probation revoked and went to jail for a period of time. He indicated that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8085 - 2005-03-31
had his probation revoked and went to jail for a period of time. He indicated that the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8085 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gary L. Parson
. However, the latter sentence was stayed in favor of a five-year consecutive probation period. Parson has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11953 - 2005-03-31
. However, the latter sentence was stayed in favor of a five-year consecutive probation period. Parson has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11953 - 2005-03-31
State v. Norman O. Brown
on the other counts in the Kohl’s case. The court imposed an additional sixteen-year term of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31
on the other counts in the Kohl’s case. The court imposed an additional sixteen-year term of probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12714 - 2005-03-31