Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11571 - 11580 of 63539 for records.
Search results 11571 - 11580 of 63539 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not be served by summarily reversing on procedural grounds an order that the record plainly shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566483 - 2022-09-15
not be served by summarily reversing on procedural grounds an order that the record plainly shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566483 - 2022-09-15
[PDF]
Warren Slocum v. Sandra Hohman
pays for the evaluation, denying his request to review the child’s psychological record, requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14644 - 2017-09-21
pays for the evaluation, denying his request to review the child’s psychological record, requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14644 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to. Upon consideration of the report and our independent review of the record as required by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163062 - 2017-09-21
not to. Upon consideration of the report and our independent review of the record as required by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163062 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173673 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173673 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2024AP105-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902121 - 2025-01-22
. No. 2024AP105-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=902121 - 2025-01-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 Record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725766 - 2023-11-08
-CRNM 2 Record as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725766 - 2023-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
the court’s remarks are ambiguous then we must look to the entire record to determine the court’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29166 - 2007-05-29
the court’s remarks are ambiguous then we must look to the entire record to determine the court’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29166 - 2007-05-29
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122144 - 2014-09-17
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122144 - 2014-09-17
State v. Floyd E. Murphy
), and Rule 809.32(1), Stats., to which Murphy responded. After an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11959 - 2005-03-31
), and Rule 809.32(1), Stats., to which Murphy responded. After an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11959 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24
right to file a response, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24