Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11581 - 11590 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 11581 - 11590 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
County of Milwaukee v. Edward S.
. appeals from an order denying his post-commitment motion for relief. He claims that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2491 - 2005-03-31
. appeals from an order denying his post-commitment motion for relief. He claims that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2491 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Winnebago v. Gary A. Burns
court’s denial of his motion to suppress based upon his claim that his arrest was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4648 - 2017-09-19
court’s denial of his motion to suppress based upon his claim that his arrest was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4648 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
video. Kohel’s counsel advised that he was holding off on filing a motion to dismiss until the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36725 - 2009-06-09
video. Kohel’s counsel advised that he was holding off on filing a motion to dismiss until the parties
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36725 - 2009-06-09
[PDF]
State v. Bruce Knutson
and Knutson then were taken into custody. ¶4 Knutson was charged with (1) conspiracy to obtain cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3163 - 2017-09-19
and Knutson then were taken into custody. ¶4 Knutson was charged with (1) conspiracy to obtain cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3163 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
The State stipulates to Kohel’s recitation of the history of the case as set forth in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36725 - 2014-09-15
The State stipulates to Kohel’s recitation of the history of the case as set forth in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Moroney heard the postconviction motion and entered the order denying postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33994 - 2014-09-15
. Moroney heard the postconviction motion and entered the order denying postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33994 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2008-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress the fruits of an unlawful stop. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231276 - 2018-12-26
that the circuit court erroneously denied his motion to suppress the fruits of an unlawful stop. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231276 - 2018-12-26
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
increased his “custody level” and rendered him “ineligible for minimum security placement.” Hughes claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31
increased his “custody level” and rendered him “ineligible for minimum security placement.” Hughes claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31