Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 6293 for 208.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 6293 for 208.
Denis Collins v. Andrew Policano
, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶6 Generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15063 - 2005-03-31
, 208 Wis.2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997). ¶6 Generally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15063 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion. State v. Dukes, 2007 WI App 175, ¶26, 303 Wis. 2d 208, 736 N.W.2d 515. A court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221655 - 2018-10-10
discretion. State v. Dukes, 2007 WI App 175, ¶26, 303 Wis. 2d 208, 736 N.W.2d 515. A court properly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=221655 - 2018-10-10
[PDF]
U.S. Bank National Association v. City of Milwaukee
, as it survives Nankin, but also related statutes. Our review is de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6279 - 2017-09-19
, as it survives Nankin, but also related statutes. Our review is de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6279 - 2017-09-19
Nesbitt Farms, LLC v. City of Madison
of Edgewater, 208 Wis. 2d 259, 265, 559 N.W.2d 914 (Ct. App. 1997) (actions to appeal a county board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5576 - 2005-03-31
of Edgewater, 208 Wis. 2d 259, 265, 559 N.W.2d 914 (Ct. App. 1997) (actions to appeal a county board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5576 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William Strong
; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.” State v. McCallum, 208 Wis.2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13558 - 2017-09-21
; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.” State v. McCallum, 208 Wis.2d 463, 473, 561 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13558 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steenberg Homes, Inc.
of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 365, 560 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13518 - 2017-09-21
of statutory interpretation, which we review de novo. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 365, 560 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13518 - 2017-09-21
Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Frank M. Kett
the intent of the legislature in creating it. See Anderson v. City of Milwaukee, 208 Wis.2d 18, 25, 559 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12139 - 2005-03-31
the intent of the legislature in creating it. See Anderson v. City of Milwaukee, 208 Wis.2d 18, 25, 559 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12139 - 2005-03-31
Marjorie Leonard v. Judy R. Cattahach
legislative intent. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 365, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997). We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11654 - 2005-03-31
legislative intent. Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis.2d 361, 365, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App. 1997). We begin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11654 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 208, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). We accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89341 - 2012-11-13
is a question of constitutional fact. State v. Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d 201, 208, 589 N.W.2d 387 (1999). We accept
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89341 - 2012-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
, then the double jeopardy clause prohibits an increase in that sentence. State v. Jones, 2002 WI App 208, ¶9, 257
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34444 - 2008-11-04
, then the double jeopardy clause prohibits an increase in that sentence. State v. Jones, 2002 WI App 208, ¶9, 257
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34444 - 2008-11-04