Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 83470 for case code.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 83470 for case code.
Rufus West v. Gerald Berge
it was approved, as required by Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.76(1) (May 2003). The record does not support West’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20998 - 2006-01-18
it was approved, as required by Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.76(1) (May 2003). The record does not support West’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20998 - 2006-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
The ALJ in Peszko’s case saw it differently. He concluded that WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DWD 80.32(7) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134231 - 2017-09-21
The ALJ in Peszko’s case saw it differently. He concluded that WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DWD 80.32(7) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134231 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that adopted the state traffic code. The case was then properly appealed to the circuit No. 2022AP1288
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660979 - 2023-05-25
that adopted the state traffic code. The case was then properly appealed to the circuit No. 2022AP1288
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660979 - 2023-05-25
Richard Seider v. Connie O'Connell
2000 WI 76 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-1223 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17393 - 2005-03-31
2000 WI 76 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 98-1223 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17393 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Richard Seider v. Connie O'Connell
in the context of this case, the court of appeals held that Wis. Admin. Code § INS 4.01(2)(e) conflicts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17393 - 2017-09-21
in the context of this case, the court of appeals held that Wis. Admin. Code § INS 4.01(2)(e) conflicts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17393 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Brenda L. Lenzner v. Timothy J. Lenzner
modified for business expenses. WISCONSIN ADMIN. CODE § DWD 40.03(1)(Dec. 2003).1 ¶5 WISCONSIN ADMIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25342 - 2017-09-21
modified for business expenses. WISCONSIN ADMIN. CODE § DWD 40.03(1)(Dec. 2003).1 ¶5 WISCONSIN ADMIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25342 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
accumulated 3,159 code violations, 319 of which relate to electrical problems such as exposed, improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071762 - 2026-02-03
accumulated 3,159 code violations, 319 of which relate to electrical problems such as exposed, improper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1071762 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a contested case hearing concerning an air pollution control permit granted to Enbridge Energy, Limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146017 - 2017-09-21
a contested case hearing concerning an air pollution control permit granted to Enbridge Energy, Limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146017 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a “pro se mistake” by filing his petition for review of the contested case hearing under Wis. Admin. Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146017 - 2015-08-10
a “pro se mistake” by filing his petition for review of the contested case hearing under Wis. Admin. Code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146017 - 2015-08-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
establishment”); WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 79.03(3) (Nov. 2020)3 (defining a “[c]ampground” as “a parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319624 - 2020-12-30
establishment”); WIS. ADMIN. CODE § ATCP 79.03(3) (Nov. 2020)3 (defining a “[c]ampground” as “a parcel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319624 - 2020-12-30