Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 62306 for child support.

COURT OF APPEALS
2010, James received Huber privileges for work release. He explained the child support agency took
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77807 - 2012-02-06

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, James received Huber privileges for work release. He explained the child support agency took partial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77807 - 2014-09-15

Kimberly A. Cashin v. William G. Cashin
. Admin. Code ยง HSS 80 and applied that formula in determining the amount of child support he was to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6383 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Kimberly A. Cashin v. William G. Cashin
and applied that formula in determining the amount of child support he was to pay Kimberly. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6383 - 2017-09-19

Tracie M. v. Andrew J.W.
, and protection, either directly or in the form of child support payments, and whether Andrew ... has assisted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11823 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tracie M. v. Andrew J.W.
in the support, care or well- being of the child [or the mother during her pregnancy] and whether the person has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11823 - 2017-09-21

Karen J. Miemietz v. George J. Miemietz
earned $51,000 annually. The court ordered him to pay $1,232 child support for their three children who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6337 - 2005-03-31

[MS WORD] IW-1791T: Permanency Hearing Order with Termination of Parental Rights Notice - Indian Child
by evidence that: |_| You have left your child without provision for care or support
/formdisplay/IW-1791T.doc?formNumber=IW-1791T&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2025-11-20

[PDF] State v. Bobbie K.
of the child, whether the person has neglected or refused to provide care or support for the child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18646 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
was not contested and that the parties had waived maintenance, and further stated that child support would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75827 - 2011-12-28