Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 29821 for des.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 29821 for des.
William A. Wulf v. City of Merrill
of their discretionary method of plowing snow. ¶3 This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15901 - 2005-03-31
of their discretionary method of plowing snow. ¶3 This court reviews summary judgments de novo, employing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15901 - 2005-03-31
City of Milwaukee v. Daniel Edward Holman
following the municipal court conviction requested a trial de novo. The circuit court responded that Holman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13034 - 2005-03-31
following the municipal court conviction requested a trial de novo. The circuit court responded that Holman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13034 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
R & M Markets, Inc. v. Spatz Centers, Inc.
decide de novo. See id. As was implicitly found by the trial court, we conclude that the lease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10565 - 2017-09-20
decide de novo. See id. As was implicitly found by the trial court, we conclude that the lease
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10565 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Amusement Devices, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
review the issue de novo because of what it believes is the commission’s limited experience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3246 - 2017-09-19
review the issue de novo because of what it believes is the commission’s limited experience
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3246 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
demonstrates Padilla is not entitled to relief. We review de novo whether Padilla’s motion alleged sufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114779 - 2014-06-17
demonstrates Padilla is not entitled to relief. We review de novo whether Padilla’s motion alleged sufficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114779 - 2014-06-17
Patricia S. Vander Bloemen v. State of Wisconsin Deparment of Natural Resources
a question of law which we review de novo. Ours is not a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9270 - 2005-03-31
a question of law which we review de novo. Ours is not a de novo standard of review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9270 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with § 800.14 when seeking to appeal presents a question of law we review de novo. See Welin v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89798 - 2014-09-15
with § 800.14 when seeking to appeal presents a question of law we review de novo. See Welin v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89798 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hemp, 2014 WI 129, ¶12, 359 Wis. 2d 320, 856 N.W.2d 811
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209742 - 2018-03-15
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hemp, 2014 WI 129, ¶12, 359 Wis. 2d 320, 856 N.W.2d 811
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209742 - 2018-03-15
[PDF]
R & R Logging v. Flannery Trucking, Inc.
or denial of a motion for summary judgment de novo. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11905 - 2017-09-21
or denial of a motion for summary judgment de novo. Brownelli v. McCaughtry, 182 Wis.2d 367, 372, 514 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Whitewater v. Darren R. Gill
their request for a trial de novo and stipulated that the matter would be decided on the record pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14234 - 2014-09-15
their request for a trial de novo and stipulated that the matter would be decided on the record pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14234 - 2014-09-15