Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 19223 for inmates search.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 19223 for inmates search.
COURT OF APPEALS
of Corrections to deny discretionary parole until an inmate is close to his mandatory release date; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49112 - 2010-04-19
of Corrections to deny discretionary parole until an inmate is close to his mandatory release date; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49112 - 2010-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion…. The inmate has the burden of proving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131864 - 2014-12-22
reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion…. The inmate has the burden of proving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131864 - 2014-12-22
09AP574 State v. Gerald A. LaDue.doc
statutes. We begin with Wis. Stat. § 302.43, which provides that an inmate serving a sentence in a county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38058 - 2009-07-21
statutes. We begin with Wis. Stat. § 302.43, which provides that an inmate serving a sentence in a county
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38058 - 2009-07-21
Walter G. Szymanski v. Jane Gamble
. In this habeas corpus action, Walter G. Szymanski, an inmate of the Wisconsin state prisons, argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2942 - 2005-03-31
. In this habeas corpus action, Walter G. Szymanski, an inmate of the Wisconsin state prisons, argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2942 - 2005-03-31
Larry E. Olson v. Jon Litscher
corpus in this court; the DOC has no authority to hold an inmate in custody beyond his or her mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15428 - 2005-03-31
corpus in this court; the DOC has no authority to hold an inmate in custody beyond his or her mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15428 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James R. Matlouck v. Randall R. Hepp
on uncharged sex offenses did not violate due process because inmate had no liberty interest in discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26583 - 2017-09-21
on uncharged sex offenses did not violate due process because inmate had no liberty interest in discretionary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26583 - 2017-09-21
Robert E. Taliaferro, Jr. v. Judy Smith
department may discipline inmates in its legal custody,” so long as the inmates have not already been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18891 - 2005-07-06
department may discipline inmates in its legal custody,” so long as the inmates have not already been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18891 - 2005-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion…. The inmate has the burden of proving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
reasonable minds could arrive at the same conclusion…. The inmate has the burden of proving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131864 - 2017-09-21
James R. Matlouck v. Randall R. Hepp
not violate due process because inmate had no liberty interest in discretionary parole determination); Neal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26583 - 2006-09-27
not violate due process because inmate had no liberty interest in discretionary parole determination); Neal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26583 - 2006-09-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Ervie Gray, an inmate in the Wisconsin prison system, filed this small claims action, which includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100888 - 2017-09-21
Ervie Gray, an inmate in the Wisconsin prison system, filed this small claims action, which includes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100888 - 2017-09-21