Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 84328 for ninth judicial district.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 84328 for ninth judicial district.
Frontsheet
for District II certified the appeal pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.61,[1] and we accepted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99360 - 2014-01-08
for District II certified the appeal pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.61,[1] and we accepted
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99360 - 2014-01-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. Appeal No. 2008AP1111 Cir. Ct. No. 2006CV4153 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36614 - 2009-05-27
. Appeal No. 2008AP1111 Cir. Ct. No. 2006CV4153 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36614 - 2009-05-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV BANK OF DEERFIELD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36614 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT IV BANK OF DEERFIELD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36614 - 2014-09-15
The Baldewein Company v. Tri-Clover, Inc.
, based upon sales figures from both Baldewein and Tri-Clover, the district court concluded that although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17486 - 2005-03-31
, based upon sales figures from both Baldewein and Tri-Clover, the district court concluded that although
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17486 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
The Baldewein Company v. Tri-Clover, Inc.
was headquartered. In fact, based upon sales figures from both Baldewein and Tri-Clover, the district court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17486 - 2017-09-21
was headquartered. In fact, based upon sales figures from both Baldewein and Tri-Clover, the district court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17486 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 76
)(a) is unconstitutional on its face. We conclude that § 4.08(2)(a), the B-2 District, is unconstitutional on its face
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33264 - 2014-09-15
)(a) is unconstitutional on its face. We conclude that § 4.08(2)(a), the B-2 District, is unconstitutional on its face
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33264 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
conclude that § 4.08(2)(a), the B-2 District, is unconstitutional on its face because it is arbitrary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33264 - 2008-06-30
conclude that § 4.08(2)(a), the B-2 District, is unconstitutional on its face because it is arbitrary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33264 - 2008-06-30
Pounder Brothers, Inc. v. Guardian Pipeline, LLC
. Appeal No. 04-0190 Cir. Ct. No. 01-CV-001052 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7252 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 04-0190 Cir. Ct. No. 01-CV-001052 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7252 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Pounder Brothers, Inc. v. Guardian Pipeline, LLC
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II IN RE THE ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE OF POUNDER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7252 - 2017-09-20
OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II IN RE THE ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE OF POUNDER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7252 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Municipal court directory
Directory of Municpal Judges ………………………………23 Judicial Administrative Districts …………………………40 Office
/contact/docs/muni.pdf - 2022-05-11
Directory of Municpal Judges ………………………………23 Judicial Administrative Districts …………………………40 Office
/contact/docs/muni.pdf - 2022-05-11