Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 1161 - 1170 of 83395 for simple case search.
2007 WI APP 223
2007 WI App 223 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP2537 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30258 - 2007-10-30
2007 WI App 223 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP2537 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30258 - 2007-10-30
[PDF]
WI APP 223
2007 WI APP 223 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP2537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30258 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 223 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP2537
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30258 - 2014-09-15
State v. Adrian Castelan-Martinez
footnote Castelan urges us to accept goes on to say that “[a] field sobriety test could be as simple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24892 - 2006-04-25
footnote Castelan urges us to accept goes on to say that “[a] field sobriety test could be as simple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24892 - 2006-04-25
Kim Nowatske v. Mark D. Osterloh, M.D.
(1993-94), this court accepted the case but limited its review to the following issue: "Whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16863 - 2005-03-31
(1993-94), this court accepted the case but limited its review to the following issue: "Whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16863 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ruth Woodring
of the officer’s duties.” See Wis J I—Criminal 1766.[4] Because this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10581 - 2005-03-31
of the officer’s duties.” See Wis J I—Criminal 1766.[4] Because this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10581 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Bremer
of the officer’s duties.” See Wis J I—Criminal 1766.[4] Because this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10582 - 2005-03-31
of the officer’s duties.” See Wis J I—Criminal 1766.[4] Because this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10582 - 2005-03-31
State v. Karl Meyer
of the officer’s duties.” See Wis J I—Criminal 1766.[4] Because this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31
of the officer’s duties.” See Wis J I—Criminal 1766.[4] Because this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10583 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ronald C. Renkoski
of the officer’s duties.” See Wis J I—Criminal 1766.[4] Because this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10584 - 2005-03-31
of the officer’s duties.” See Wis J I—Criminal 1766.[4] Because this case involves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10584 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115626 - 2014-06-24
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115626 - 2014-06-24
State v. Donald F. Sheffey
acted vindictively in bringing additional charges after the first case against him ended in mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26
acted vindictively in bringing additional charges after the first case against him ended in mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24910 - 2006-04-26