Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Monroe Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Harlan H.
. The motion stated that Harlan had violated that order by having written contact with his daughters more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2453 - 2017-09-19
. The motion stated that Harlan had violated that order by having written contact with his daughters more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2453 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Monroe Co. Department of Health and Family Services v. Harlan H.
. The motion stated that Harlan had violated that order by having written contact with his daughters more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2454 - 2017-09-19
. The motion stated that Harlan had violated that order by having written contact with his daughters more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2454 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of the WFDL." 8 ¶17 On August 31, 2015, the circuit court issued a decision and order granting a motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192000 - 2017-09-21
of the WFDL." 8 ¶17 On August 31, 2015, the circuit court issued a decision and order granting a motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192000 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assault of a child under the age of thirteen, and an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727904 - 2023-11-14
assault of a child under the age of thirteen, and an order denying his postconviction motion. On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727904 - 2023-11-14
State v. Ernest E. Halford
in custody in St. Paul, Halford was questioned by the St. Paul police. He invoked his Miranda rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2394 - 2005-03-31
in custody in St. Paul, Halford was questioned by the St. Paul police. He invoked his Miranda rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2394 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
their paternal grandmother’s motion, filed five months after their parents divorced, for visitation rights.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134439 - 2015-03-04
their paternal grandmother’s motion, filed five months after their parents divorced, for visitation rights.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134439 - 2015-03-04
COURT OF APPEALS
on any of the alleged grounds for termination. The court denied the motion as to Wis. Stat. § 48.415(9m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69466 - 2011-08-10
on any of the alleged grounds for termination. The court denied the motion as to Wis. Stat. § 48.415(9m
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69466 - 2011-08-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
No. 2014AP1283 2 motion, filed five months after their parents divorced, for visitation rights. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134439 - 2017-09-21
No. 2014AP1283 2 motion, filed five months after their parents divorced, for visitation rights. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134439 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of felony murder. Wesley argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171178 - 2017-09-21
of felony murder. Wesley argues that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171178 - 2017-09-21
2008 WI APP 154
. Prior to trial, Jones filed a motion to suppress the evidence, which was denied. Jones challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
. Prior to trial, Jones filed a motion to suppress the evidence, which was denied. Jones challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14