Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and we affirm the circuit court. ¶2 Brown was on extended supervision when his supervising agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97608 - 2014-09-15
, and we affirm the circuit court. ¶2 Brown was on extended supervision when his supervising agent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97608 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and treat him, regardless of his consent. The circuit court ordered that B.C.’s commitment be extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191024 - 2017-09-21
and treat him, regardless of his consent. The circuit court ordered that B.C.’s commitment be extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191024 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
followed by thirty years of extended supervision. Postconviction, Deroo filed a motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246911 - 2019-09-18
followed by thirty years of extended supervision. Postconviction, Deroo filed a motion for sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246911 - 2019-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. Ezell moved for postconviction relief, arguing that he received ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459758 - 2021-12-07
of extended supervision. Ezell moved for postconviction relief, arguing that he received ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459758 - 2021-12-07
State v. Adam J. Soltis
. [2] The State filed a motion to extend the time to file a reply brief, which was granted. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7625 - 2005-03-31
. [2] The State filed a motion to extend the time to file a reply brief, which was granted. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7625 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and one year of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218628 - 2018-09-05
of initial confinement and one year of extended supervision. This no-merit appeal follows. The no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218628 - 2018-09-05
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of initial confinement and 9 years of extended supervision, which was less than half of the maximum time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030748 - 2025-11-05
of initial confinement and 9 years of extended supervision, which was less than half of the maximum time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030748 - 2025-11-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the statutory maximum of one and one-half years of initial confinement followed by two years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728000 - 2023-11-14
to the statutory maximum of one and one-half years of initial confinement followed by two years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728000 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an aggregate sentence of ten years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248933 - 2019-10-23
an aggregate sentence of ten years of initial confinement and five years of extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248933 - 2019-10-23
State v. Randy J. Beaty
not file the notice within the twenty days contemplated by the rule, this court extended the deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12814 - 2005-03-31
not file the notice within the twenty days contemplated by the rule, this court extended the deadline
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12814 - 2005-03-31