Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 69114 for he.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 69114 for he.
CA Blank Order
court held an evidentiary hearing on the motion, and trial counsel testified that he had no strategic
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103641 - 2013-10-27
court held an evidentiary hearing on the motion, and trial counsel testified that he had no strategic
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103641 - 2013-10-27
City of Clintonville v. Michael J. Kuhn
of a city ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3919 - 2013-10-16
of a city ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3919 - 2013-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Miranda2 rights, Bent told police that he had been drinking prior to the shooting and was “highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
Miranda2 rights, Bent told police that he had been drinking prior to the shooting and was “highly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
battery. He also appeals orders denying postconviction relief. Mason argues: (1) the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206034 - 2017-12-27
battery. He also appeals orders denying postconviction relief. Mason argues: (1) the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206034 - 2017-12-27
[PDF]
State v. Brian A. Gleiter
his guilty plea based on his claim that he did not understand the sexual contact element of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25478 - 2017-09-21
his guilty plea based on his claim that he did not understand the sexual contact element of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25478 - 2017-09-21
State v. Darryl E. Pierce
robbery and an order denying postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3800 - 2005-03-31
robbery and an order denying postconviction relief. He argues that he was denied effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3800 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
could not consider the violations because the State did not prove he committed them. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2005-03-31
could not consider the violations because the State did not prove he committed them. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57826 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of Wis. Stat. § 948.025(1) (2003-04).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36801 - 2009-06-16
of Wis. Stat. § 948.025(1) (2003-04).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36801 - 2009-06-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
) (2003-04).1 He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36801 - 2014-09-15
) (2003-04).1 He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36801 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jesus Ortega, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
committee to find him guilty of the offense; (2) he was denied his right to the assistance of a staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13125 - 2017-09-21
committee to find him guilty of the offense; (2) he was denied his right to the assistance of a staff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13125 - 2017-09-21