Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 58501 for o j.

Northern Clearing, Inc. v. Larson-Juhl, Inc.
., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Larson-Juhl, Inc., appeals a judgment awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7206 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rogers Development, Inc. v. Rock County Planning and Development Committee
. Before Vergeront, P.J., Roggensack and Lundsten, JJ. No. 02-0017 2 ¶1 ROGGENSACK, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4787 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2022AP531 2 ¶1 GILL, J.1 Kane2 appeals from an order terminating his parental rights (TPR) to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=571790 - 2022-09-27

COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Richard j. sankovitz, Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96778 - 2013-05-20

COURT OF APPEALS
argues that “[t]o the extent that Nieves claims that the court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80046 - 2012-03-26

State v. Raymond D. Damouth
., Deininger and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 DEININGER, J. Raymond Damouth appeals a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5523 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Victor Naydihor
: On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Philip J. Brehm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4609 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Northern Clearing, Inc. v. Larson-Juhl, Inc.
. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Larson-Juhl, Inc., appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7206 - 2017-09-20

2010 WI APP 174
. kahn, jr., Judge. Affirmed. Before Curley, P.J., Fine and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 FINE, J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56997 - 2010-12-13

WI APP 91 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2256 2012AP2257 Comple...
, J. This is a sick-leave-benefits case similar to the one we decided in Champine v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98257 - 2014-03-09