Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 81753 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 81753 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
COURT OF APPEALS
quantity of marijuana as party to a crime. As probable cause, the complaint alleged that Drug Enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2012-10-29
quantity of marijuana as party to a crime. As probable cause, the complaint alleged that Drug Enforcement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2012-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. As probable cause, the complaint alleged that Drug Enforcement Administration special agent Bernard Bolf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88800 - 2014-09-15
. As probable cause, the complaint alleged that Drug Enforcement Administration special agent Bernard Bolf
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88800 - 2014-09-15
John Nierengarten v. Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, Inc.
father had previously tested negative for the disease and, therefore, the child "had no more chance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17138 - 2005-03-31
father had previously tested negative for the disease and, therefore, the child "had no more chance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17138 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John Nierengarten v. Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan, Inc.
father had previously tested negative for the disease and, therefore, the child "had no more chance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17138 - 2017-09-21
father had previously tested negative for the disease and, therefore, the child "had no more chance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17138 - 2017-09-21
Material Service Corporation v. Michels Pipe Line Construction, Inc.
quantity was rejected for cosmetic reasons (the interior or exterior was rough). A sample of the pipes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9352 - 2005-03-31
quantity was rejected for cosmetic reasons (the interior or exterior was rough). A sample of the pipes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9352 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Material Service Corporation v. Michels Pipe Line Construction, Inc.
was rough). A sample of the pipes was inspected for spigot uniformity, and the internal and external
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9352 - 2017-09-19
was rough). A sample of the pipes was inspected for spigot uniformity, and the internal and external
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9352 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joshua G. Storlie
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: GREGORY A. PETERSON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11125 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: GREGORY A. PETERSON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11125 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: STEPHANIE ROTHSTEIN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115583 - 2017-09-21
from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: STEPHANIE ROTHSTEIN, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115583 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Joshua G. Storlie
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: GREGORY A. PETERSON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11125 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Eau Claire County: GREGORY A. PETERSON
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11125 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Bagneski, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from judgments and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29407 - 2007-06-18
Bagneski, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from judgments and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29407 - 2007-06-18