Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 11611 - 11620 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Douglas T. Meyer
counsel was ineffective for agreeing to amend the defective information; (3) the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3811 - 2005-03-31
counsel was ineffective for agreeing to amend the defective information; (3) the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3811 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
not raise ineffectiveness of trial counsel. He specifically alleged that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33521 - 2014-09-15
not raise ineffectiveness of trial counsel. He specifically alleged that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33521 - 2014-09-15
Patricia Auger v. Lois Rogers
limits were less than United Fire’s underinsured coverage limits. The trial court denied the Augers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11743 - 2005-03-31
limits were less than United Fire’s underinsured coverage limits. The trial court denied the Augers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11743 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2001-02).[1] He seeks a new trial on grounds that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34886 - 2008-12-15
under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2001-02).[1] He seeks a new trial on grounds that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34886 - 2008-12-15
State v. Kurt A. Loewen
deference to the trial court. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 283, 389 N.W.2d 12, 30 (1986). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8209 - 2005-03-31
deference to the trial court. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 283, 389 N.W.2d 12, 30 (1986). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8209 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Melissa Ertz Rogge v. Paul Aaron Rogge
the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the question of daycare expenses while the No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19
the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the question of daycare expenses while the No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Barnes
of a new factor. See id. If he or she does so, then the trial court must determine whether the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13395 - 2017-09-21
of a new factor. See id. If he or she does so, then the trial court must determine whether the new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Peter A. Moss
with the intent to unlawfully sell, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 167.10(2).1 He also challenges the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3160 - 2017-09-19
with the intent to unlawfully sell, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 167.10(2).1 He also challenges the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3160 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Peter A. Moss
with the intent to unlawfully sell, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 167.10(2).1 He also challenges the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3161 - 2017-09-19
with the intent to unlawfully sell, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 167.10(2).1 He also challenges the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3161 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jerome E. Buie
postconviction motion. Buie contends: (1) the trial court erred in allowing a surprise witness to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26057 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion. Buie contends: (1) the trial court erred in allowing a surprise witness to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26057 - 2017-09-21