Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11631 - 11640 of 83379 for simple case search.
Search results 11631 - 11640 of 83379 for simple case search.
State v. Eric Pittman
with two DEA agents, who gave him $100 for a drug buy. The agents searched Stewart when they gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13994 - 2005-03-31
with two DEA agents, who gave him $100 for a drug buy. The agents searched Stewart when they gave him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13994 - 2005-03-31
James Lee Harris v. David H. Schwarz
of a car being driven by Mr. Harris. A search of the vehicle revealed a film canister under the driver’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10806 - 2005-03-31
of a car being driven by Mr. Harris. A search of the vehicle revealed a film canister under the driver’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10806 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard D. Martin
(Ct. App. 1996). However, appellate courts will independently examine the case’s circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3231 - 2017-09-19
(Ct. App. 1996). However, appellate courts will independently examine the case’s circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3231 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failed in this case, we “may search the record to determine if it supports” the decision. See Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619730 - 2023-02-08
failed in this case, we “may search the record to determine if it supports” the decision. See Randall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619730 - 2023-02-08
Peter A. Liptak v. Theresa A. Liptak
search the record to determine whether additional reasons exist to support the trial court’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
search the record to determine whether additional reasons exist to support the trial court’s exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5182 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, and “[w]e search the record for facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118993 - 2014-08-06
court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous, and “[w]e search the record for facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118993 - 2014-08-06
[PDF]
State v. Richard W. Foelker
the “illegal stop of the vehicle,” “the illegal arrest of the Defendant,” the “illegal, warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9540 - 2017-09-19
the “illegal stop of the vehicle,” “the illegal arrest of the Defendant,” the “illegal, warrantless search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9540 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
searches and seizures. Traffic stops are considered seizures, and if the seizure was unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145690 - 2017-09-21
searches and seizures. Traffic stops are considered seizures, and if the seizure was unreasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145690 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard D. Martin
. App. 1996). However, appellate courts will independently examine the case’s circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31
. App. 1996). However, appellate courts will independently examine the case’s circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
inspection report], the plaintiff in this case, certainly could have opted for more testing as recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26817 - 2014-09-15
inspection report], the plaintiff in this case, certainly could have opted for more testing as recommended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26817 - 2014-09-15