Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11641 - 11650 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 11641 - 11650 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
The State stipulates to Kohel’s recitation of the history of the case as set forth in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36725 - 2014-09-15
The State stipulates to Kohel’s recitation of the history of the case as set forth in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36725 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for a new trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148375 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2010-10-12
of conviction entered against him and the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33994 - 2010-10-12
Mark Hughes v. Stephen Puckett
increased his “custody level” and rendered him “ineligible for minimum security placement.” Hughes claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31
increased his “custody level” and rendered him “ineligible for minimum security placement.” Hughes claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5313 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for a prior conviction. On July 3, 2005, he was taken into custody after contacting Burnett County law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44834 - 2014-09-15
for a prior conviction. On July 3, 2005, he was taken into custody after contacting Burnett County law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44834 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the safe place statute. Both the Village and the Tractor Pullers filed motions for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647401 - 2023-04-25
the safe place statute. Both the Village and the Tractor Pullers filed motions for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647401 - 2023-04-25
[PDF]
State v. O'Connor Pickle
warnings if the person is in custody and under interrogation. See State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16072 - 2017-09-21
warnings if the person is in custody and under interrogation. See State v. Armstrong, 223 Wis. 2d 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16072 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was taken into custody after contacting Burnett County law enforcement complaining of government
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44834 - 2009-12-21
was taken into custody after contacting Burnett County law enforcement complaining of government
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44834 - 2009-12-21
State v. Benjamin L. Simms
are interviewed in custody of their constitutional rights, those are all issues for the Judge to decide in advance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14953 - 2005-03-31
are interviewed in custody of their constitutional rights, those are all issues for the Judge to decide in advance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14953 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary C. Pentinmaki v. Oliver A. Pentinmaki, Jr.
cause and contempt motions arguing that the other violated the provisions of their custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9059 - 2017-09-19
cause and contempt motions arguing that the other violated the provisions of their custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9059 - 2017-09-19