Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11641 - 11650 of 68942 for did.
Search results 11641 - 11650 of 68942 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
footwear.[3] Urban also told Barbara she could revoke her consent at any time. She never did so, but she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
footwear.[3] Urban also told Barbara she could revoke her consent at any time. She never did so, but she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
by denying his motion to suppress because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion that Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31947 - 2014-09-15
by denying his motion to suppress because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion that Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
arguments, we note that Crystal seems to assume that the only information the circuit court did or could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32459 - 2014-09-15
arguments, we note that Crystal seems to assume that the only information the circuit court did or could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32459 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did raise. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2000, Douglas was charged with two counts of second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232920 - 2019-01-17
did raise. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2000, Douglas was charged with two counts of second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232920 - 2019-01-17
State v. Christina M. Goerlitz
and did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Christina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
and did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Christina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the court did not consider Lisa’s undisputed testimony that the couple moved to the Eau Claire area in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31791 - 2008-02-11
, and the court did not consider Lisa’s undisputed testimony that the couple moved to the Eau Claire area in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31791 - 2008-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
authorizations. Rosemary knew about the application for the policy and the conversions, although she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54635 - 2010-11-03
authorizations. Rosemary knew about the application for the policy and the conversions, although she did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54635 - 2010-11-03
State v. James Metz
to the officer, but, at that point, the officer remained outside the apartment. The officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2005-03-31
to the officer, but, at that point, the officer remained outside the apartment. The officer did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15259 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 68
of service of Elliot Russ,” a private process server, but that he did not see Russ in the hallway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36095 - 2009-05-26
of service of Elliot Russ,” a private process server, but that he did not see Russ in the hallway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36095 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
State v. Christopher V. Teague
observed Teague and Hanna for about five to ten seconds, during which time Officer Wells did not see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4594 - 2017-09-19
observed Teague and Hanna for about five to ten seconds, during which time Officer Wells did not see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4594 - 2017-09-19