Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11641 - 11650 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 11641 - 11650 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Julie L. Rabideau v. City of Racine
leading to his death. Rabideau subsequently filed a claim for damages against the City of Racine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17581 - 2005-03-31
leading to his death. Rabideau subsequently filed a claim for damages against the City of Racine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17581 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Slamka argues that WERC erred by dismissing Slamka’s unfair labor practice claim on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344876 - 2021-03-11
. Slamka argues that WERC erred by dismissing Slamka’s unfair labor practice claim on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344876 - 2021-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and reiterated its conclusion that Fowler’s claims were procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74190 - 2014-09-15
and reiterated its conclusion that Fowler’s claims were procedurally barred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74190 - 2014-09-15
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Kevin O'Keefe
Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its defamation claim against attorney Kevin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10403 - 2005-03-31
Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its defamation claim against attorney Kevin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10403 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
issue preclusion does not apply because the Doubledays’ claim that Goeman’s right to a legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659123 - 2023-05-24
issue preclusion does not apply because the Doubledays’ claim that Goeman’s right to a legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659123 - 2023-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
and reiterated its conclusion that Fowler’s claims were procedurally barred. Discussion ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74190 - 2011-11-21
and reiterated its conclusion that Fowler’s claims were procedurally barred. Discussion ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74190 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony K. Murphy
from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 postconviction motion. Murphy claims that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26099 - 2017-09-21
from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 postconviction motion. Murphy claims that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26099 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
se postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06, seeking a new trial. He claimed postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211654 - 2018-04-19
se postconviction motion under WIS. STAT. § 974.06, seeking a new trial. He claimed postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211654 - 2018-04-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion raising the same claim. The circuit court again denied his request, recognizing that it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022451 - 2025-10-14
motion raising the same claim. The circuit court again denied his request, recognizing that it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1022451 - 2025-10-14
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Netzer
to misdemeanor stalking and violating a harassment restraining order. He claims his pleas were invalid because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6108 - 2017-09-19
to misdemeanor stalking and violating a harassment restraining order. He claims his pleas were invalid because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6108 - 2017-09-19