Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11641 - 11650 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 11641 - 11650 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The issue is whether the trial court imposed an illegal sentence by misconstruing the felony murder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44866 - 2014-09-15
. The issue is whether the trial court imposed an illegal sentence by misconstruing the felony murder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44866 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Patricia Auger v. Lois Rogers
liability coverage limits were less than United Fire’s underinsured coverage limits. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11743 - 2017-09-20
liability coverage limits were less than United Fire’s underinsured coverage limits. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11743 - 2017-09-20
State v. Douglas T. Meyer
counsel was ineffective for agreeing to amend the defective information; (3) the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3811 - 2005-03-31
counsel was ineffective for agreeing to amend the defective information; (3) the trial court failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3811 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
not raise ineffectiveness of trial counsel. He specifically alleged that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33521 - 2014-09-15
not raise ineffectiveness of trial counsel. He specifically alleged that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33521 - 2014-09-15
Patricia Auger v. Lois Rogers
limits were less than United Fire’s underinsured coverage limits. The trial court denied the Augers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11743 - 2005-03-31
limits were less than United Fire’s underinsured coverage limits. The trial court denied the Augers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11743 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2001-02).[1] He seeks a new trial on grounds that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34886 - 2008-12-15
under Wis. Stat. ch. 980 (2001-02).[1] He seeks a new trial on grounds that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34886 - 2008-12-15
State v. Kurt A. Loewen
deference to the trial court. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 283, 389 N.W.2d 12, 30 (1986). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8209 - 2005-03-31
deference to the trial court. State v. Bangert, 131 Wis.2d 246, 283, 389 N.W.2d 12, 30 (1986). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8209 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Melissa Ertz Rogge v. Paul Aaron Rogge
the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the question of daycare expenses while the No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19
the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the question of daycare expenses while the No. 02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5976 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in Jerrell and because there was no evidence corroborating his confession) and that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29128 - 2014-09-15
in Jerrell and because there was no evidence corroborating his confession) and that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29128 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Zena H.
terminating their parental rights to their children, Kendall J. and Darris P. Zena argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15743 - 2017-09-21
terminating their parental rights to their children, Kendall J. and Darris P. Zena argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15743 - 2017-09-21

