Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11661 - 11670 of 83499 for case code.
Search results 11661 - 11670 of 83499 for case code.
State v. Mary H.
to Meet Return Conditions ¶22 The purpose for enacting the Children’s Code is described in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2183 - 2005-03-31
to Meet Return Conditions ¶22 The purpose for enacting the Children’s Code is described in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2183 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and grant him a new trial because the real controversy was not tried; or (3) remand his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102333 - 2017-09-21
and grant him a new trial because the real controversy was not tried; or (3) remand his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102333 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 17
2007 WI APP 17 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27364 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 17 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2006AP1233
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27364 - 2014-09-15
Barbara Lach v. Jennifer Hatala
§ 767.24(3) is accomplished by using the CHIPS procedure found in the Children’s Code, the case law carves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4056 - 2005-03-31
§ 767.24(3) is accomplished by using the CHIPS procedure found in the Children’s Code, the case law carves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4056 - 2005-03-31
John C. Kastor v. Roberta K. Kastor
that it had not been provided with any authority for such a “bifurcated” trial process in divorce cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14368 - 2005-03-31
that it had not been provided with any authority for such a “bifurcated” trial process in divorce cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14368 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John C. Kastor v. Roberta K. Kastor
for such a “bifurcated” trial process in divorce cases. After noting that it is the parties’ responsibility to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14368 - 2014-09-15
for such a “bifurcated” trial process in divorce cases. After noting that it is the parties’ responsibility to provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14368 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
one constitutional right against another. Rather, we conclude that in this case, it was error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28730 - 2007-04-16
one constitutional right against another. Rather, we conclude that in this case, it was error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28730 - 2007-04-16
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction and grant him a new trial because the real controversy was not tried; or (3) remand his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102333 - 2013-09-25
conviction and grant him a new trial because the real controversy was not tried; or (3) remand his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102333 - 2013-09-25
[PDF]
Barbara Lach v. Jennifer Hatala
will not interpret a statute in a manner that will abrogate the prevailing case law unless such intent is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4056 - 2017-09-20
will not interpret a statute in a manner that will abrogate the prevailing case law unless such intent is clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4056 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Memo in support of Supreme Court Rule petition 23-05
competency rulings in criminal cases PETITION 23-___ Memorandum in Support The petitioner
/supreme/docs/2305memo.pdf - 2023-10-12
competency rulings in criminal cases PETITION 23-___ Memorandum in Support The petitioner
/supreme/docs/2305memo.pdf - 2023-10-12