Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11661 - 11670 of 69139 for did.
Search results 11661 - 11670 of 69139 for did.
[PDF]
NOTICE
agreement and that Roosevelt did not avail itself of the available open line of credit. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52836 - 2014-09-15
agreement and that Roosevelt did not avail itself of the available open line of credit. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52836 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher D. Laurin
Laurin’s motion to suppress. The officer did not pursue Laurin into his home. He went into Laurin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2507 - 2005-03-31
Laurin’s motion to suppress. The officer did not pursue Laurin into his home. He went into Laurin’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2507 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
footwear.[3] Urban also told Barbara she could revoke her consent at any time. She never did so, but she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
footwear.[3] Urban also told Barbara she could revoke her consent at any time. She never did so, but she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116711 - 2014-07-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
by denying his motion to suppress because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion that Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31947 - 2014-09-15
by denying his motion to suppress because the officer did not have reasonable suspicion that Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
arguments, we note that Crystal seems to assume that the only information the circuit court did or could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32459 - 2014-09-15
arguments, we note that Crystal seems to assume that the only information the circuit court did or could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32459 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
did raise. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2000, Douglas was charged with two counts of second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232920 - 2019-01-17
did raise. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 2000, Douglas was charged with two counts of second-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232920 - 2019-01-17
State v. Christina M. Goerlitz
and did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Christina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
and did not erroneously exercise its discretion. We therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Christina
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15783 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the court did not consider Lisa’s undisputed testimony that the couple moved to the Eau Claire area in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31791 - 2008-02-11
, and the court did not consider Lisa’s undisputed testimony that the couple moved to the Eau Claire area in part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31791 - 2008-02-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the circuit court signed an order confirming the substitution. Calkins did not object to the substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109841 - 2017-09-21
, and the circuit court signed an order confirming the substitution. Calkins did not object to the substitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109841 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the trial court determined that Torres- Espinal did not have standing to object to the search. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759443 - 2024-02-06
, the trial court determined that Torres- Espinal did not have standing to object to the search. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759443 - 2024-02-06