Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11671 - 11680 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 11671 - 11680 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
incarceration, and twelve years of extended supervision. Appellate counsel’s no-merit report sets forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715855 - 2023-10-17
incarceration, and twelve years of extended supervision. Appellate counsel’s no-merit report sets forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=715855 - 2023-10-17
[PDF]
State v. Adam J. Soltis
. 2 The State filed a motion to extend the time to file a reply brief, which was granted. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7625 - 2017-09-19
. 2 The State filed a motion to extend the time to file a reply brief, which was granted. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7625 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and sentenced him to twenty years of initial confinement, followed by ten years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11
, and sentenced him to twenty years of initial confinement, followed by ten years of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925282 - 2025-03-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for release to extended supervision after he serves thirty years of initial confinement. This no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741649 - 2023-12-19
for release to extended supervision after he serves thirty years of initial confinement. This no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=741649 - 2023-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and two years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319622 - 2020-12-30
confinement and two years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether the evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=319622 - 2020-12-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
judgment. At a hearing on August 22, 2023, the circuit court extended the deadline to file an answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958770 - 2025-05-16
judgment. At a hearing on August 22, 2023, the circuit court extended the deadline to file an answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=958770 - 2025-05-16
James D. Luedtke v. Roger A. Luedtke
inviolate, and shall extend to all cases at law without regard to the amount in controversy; but a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11336 - 2005-03-31
inviolate, and shall extend to all cases at law without regard to the amount in controversy; but a jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anita Lusk
excluded. Wisconsin extended this holding to criminal complaints in State No. 98-2372-CR 4 v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14394 - 2014-09-15
excluded. Wisconsin extended this holding to criminal complaints in State No. 98-2372-CR 4 v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14394 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and forty-eight month’ extended supervision—eighty months’ imprisonment out of a possible total 120-month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
and forty-eight month’ extended supervision—eighty months’ imprisonment out of a possible total 120-month
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40992 - 2009-09-21
[PDF]
City of Menasha Public Works v. Kristin J. Erickson
. The doctrine of collateral estoppel does not prevent LIRC from reaching the decision to extend Erickson's
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10677 - 2017-09-20
. The doctrine of collateral estoppel does not prevent LIRC from reaching the decision to extend Erickson's
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10677 - 2017-09-20