Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11671 - 11680 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 11671 - 11680 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Gerald A. Edson
argues that: (1) the trial court lost jurisdiction to act in both cases when this court ordered a stay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10356 - 2017-09-20
argues that: (1) the trial court lost jurisdiction to act in both cases when this court ordered a stay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10356 - 2017-09-20
Barbara Lach v. Jennifer Hatala
of her two daughters to her mother, Barbara Lach. She argues that the trial court applied the wrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4056 - 2005-03-31
of her two daughters to her mother, Barbara Lach. She argues that the trial court applied the wrong
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4056 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
a new trial on damages. We disagree with Dr. Goeckner and affirm. Background ¶2 Carstensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96733 - 2013-05-13
a new trial on damages. We disagree with Dr. Goeckner and affirm. Background ¶2 Carstensen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96733 - 2013-05-13
State v. Antwan D. Robinson
no contest plea. He contends that the trial court failed during the plea colloquy to personally advise him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21138 - 2006-01-30
no contest plea. He contends that the trial court failed during the plea colloquy to personally advise him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21138 - 2006-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer Lehman
2 new trial because she was prejudiced by extraneous information improperly brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13103 - 2017-09-21
2 new trial because she was prejudiced by extraneous information improperly brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13103 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gerald A. Edson
of second-degree sexual assault of a child. See § 948.02(1) & (2).[1] Edson argues that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10356 - 2005-03-31
of second-degree sexual assault of a child. See § 948.02(1) & (2).[1] Edson argues that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10356 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jennifer Lehman
on appeal that she is entitled to a new trial because she was prejudiced by extraneous information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13103 - 2005-03-31
on appeal that she is entitled to a new trial because she was prejudiced by extraneous information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13103 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 30, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Ap...
of conviction for felony murder, following a jury trial. Buchanan also appeals from an order of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88749 - 2012-10-29
of conviction for felony murder, following a jury trial. Buchanan also appeals from an order of the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88749 - 2012-10-29
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
of his retirement plans. He first argues that the trial court engaged in improper “double-counting” when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31
of his retirement plans. He first argues that the trial court engaged in improper “double-counting” when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals from an order denying postconviction relief. Jenkins contends trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983932 - 2025-07-16
appeals from an order denying postconviction relief. Jenkins contends trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983932 - 2025-07-16