Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11681 - 11690 of 16449 for commentating.

[PDF] State v. Duane E. Elm
of counsel. Instead, the record supports trial counsel's comments on ineffective assistance: "The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7830 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Trammel V. Johnson
. It commented that when the sentences were “combined and considered in light of two armed, masked robberies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5528 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. John Norman
1485 (2001). The comment to the instruction explains: The offense is defined as engaging in one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4677 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Deborah Lee Gorman v. Richard Allen Gorman
that Richard's decision was unreasonable. The trial court commented: No. 97-3308 10 Now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13260 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
parental rights. To be sure, the trial court commented on the relationship that Gracious had with her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62968 - 2011-04-18

[PDF] CA Blank Order
his age, contradictory statements with the investigator’s comments, no coercion, Miranda rights being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=742722 - 2023-12-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the crime itself, commenting, “I can’t even image how bad it would hurt to get pepper-sprayed in the face
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=427045 - 2021-09-16

State v. Matthew C. Janssen
from family, friends, and a former school teacher; the letter left at the golf course; and comments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12444 - 2005-03-31

Kelly Shisler v. Craig Frank
by the builder, but did not otherwise comment on or discuss this issue. Id. at 207 n.1, 112 N.W.2d at 707
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12863 - 2005-03-31

State v. James M. Moran
considered in the context of the court’s comments during the sentencing hearing. In particular, the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10902 - 2005-03-31