Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11691 - 11700 of 30164 for de.
Search results 11691 - 11700 of 30164 for de.
State v. Randolph S. Miller
was inadequate under Wis. Stat. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5552 - 2005-03-31
was inadequate under Wis. Stat. § 971.08 and Bangert is a question of law we decide de novo. State v. Hansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5552 - 2005-03-31
M&I Bank South Central v. Neil C. Lofberg
, 568 N.W.2d 31, 34 (Ct. App. 1997). Review is de novo. See id. Findings of fact are normally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12752 - 2005-03-31
, 568 N.W.2d 31, 34 (Ct. App. 1997). Review is de novo. See id. Findings of fact are normally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12752 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Karl A. Burg by his legal guardian v. Cincinnati Casualty Insurance Co.
The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law subject to this court’s de novo review. Gloudeman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3336 - 2017-09-19
The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law subject to this court’s de novo review. Gloudeman v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3336 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Evette Westphal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
appeals. DISCUSSION Standard of Review. ¶9 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5267 - 2017-09-19
appeals. DISCUSSION Standard of Review. ¶9 We review summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5267 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
The Estate of Steven B. Thompson v. Jump River Electric Cooperative
We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14345 - 2014-09-15
We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14345 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven D. Cathey
(Ct. App. 1992). That is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We do not wish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
(Ct. App. 1992). That is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. We do not wish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13754 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, whether the change is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. (internal citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157680 - 2017-09-21
, whether the change is substantial is a question of law which we review de novo.” Id. (internal citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157680 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, P.J.1 Greg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612015 - 2023-01-20
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 BLANCHARD, P.J.1 Greg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612015 - 2023-01-20
[PDF]
State v. Antonio L. Simmons
facts sufficient to require an evidentiary hearing is a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6541 - 2017-09-19
facts sufficient to require an evidentiary hearing is a question of law which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6541 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 44
that the officers had a right to stop Gordon that night. ¶10 We review de novo the circuit court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109202 - 2017-09-21
that the officers had a right to stop Gordon that night. ¶10 We review de novo the circuit court’s legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109202 - 2017-09-21