Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11691 - 11700 of 83989 for simple case search.
Search results 11691 - 11700 of 83989 for simple case search.
[PDF]
NOTICE
was an intrusion but it was not an unreasonable intrusion. The court reasoned that “this is a case where if Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31015 - 2014-09-15
was an intrusion but it was not an unreasonable intrusion. The court reasoned that “this is a case where if Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31015 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court denied Peterson’s motions. ¶7 The case proceeded to a four-day jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780476 - 2024-03-26
an evidentiary hearing, the circuit court denied Peterson’s motions. ¶7 The case proceeded to a four-day jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780476 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Paul W. Schnelz
while under the influence of an intoxicant. He performed a custodial search and discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11214 - 2017-09-19
while under the influence of an intoxicant. He performed a custodial search and discovered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11214 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI App 61
2020 WI App 61 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2019AP96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287941 - 2020-11-11
2020 WI App 61 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2019AP96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287941 - 2020-11-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
2022 WI 13 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP940 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491743 - 2022-05-16
2022 WI 13 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP940 COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491743 - 2022-05-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the trial court to allow the State to reopen its case to introduce additional evidence after both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108360 - 2017-09-21
for the trial court to allow the State to reopen its case to introduce additional evidence after both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108360 - 2017-09-21
State v. Terrell A. Coleman
County Sheriff's Tactical Squad entered the residence. The officers were executing a "no knock" search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17004 - 2005-03-31
County Sheriff's Tactical Squad entered the residence. The officers were executing a "no knock" search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17004 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Terrell A. Coleman
. The officers were executing a "no knock" search warrant at the residence. They used a "hooligan," which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17004 - 2017-09-21
. The officers were executing a "no knock" search warrant at the residence. They used a "hooligan," which
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17004 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a title company conduct a title search to determine whether the Hauber property contained any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84731 - 2014-09-15
a title company conduct a title search to determine whether the Hauber property contained any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84731 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from unreasonable searches and seizures. “The temporary detention of individuals during the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170702 - 2017-09-21
from unreasonable searches and seizures. “The temporary detention of individuals during the stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170702 - 2017-09-21