Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 11691 - 11700 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 11691 - 11700 of 58312 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Bank’s summary judgment motion. The trial court denied the Bank’s summary judgment motion, noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164519 - 2017-09-21
to the Bank’s summary judgment motion. The trial court denied the Bank’s summary judgment motion, noting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164519 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a fair trial due to circuit court bias against him. As evidence of bias and the likelihood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252124 - 2020-01-16
a fair trial due to circuit court bias against him. As evidence of bias and the likelihood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252124 - 2020-01-16
[PDF]
State v. Samuel L. Hogan
postconviction motion, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Hogan claims that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11514 - 2017-09-19
postconviction motion, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Hogan claims that his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11514 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. She alleges that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise her about her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248565 - 2019-10-09
. She alleges that her trial counsel was ineffective for failing to advise her about her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248565 - 2019-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to amend the pleadings. Pursuant to a presubmission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92656 - 2013-02-12
that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to amend the pleadings. Pursuant to a presubmission
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92656 - 2013-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
argues the trial court erroneously calculated the earning capacity of his ex-wife, Susan McIntosh. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28986 - 2007-05-14
argues the trial court erroneously calculated the earning capacity of his ex-wife, Susan McIntosh. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28986 - 2007-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
enticement prior to trial; the jury found Stardust guilty of five counts of child enticement and not guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142745 - 2017-09-21
enticement prior to trial; the jury found Stardust guilty of five counts of child enticement and not guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142745 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
; and (2) the trial court imposed a harsh and excessive sentence.1 We affirm. I. ¶2 In January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82114 - 2014-09-15
; and (2) the trial court imposed a harsh and excessive sentence.1 We affirm. I. ¶2 In January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82114 - 2014-09-15
State v. Daniel Marcellus Johnson
that: (1) the State breached the plea agreement; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2005-03-31
that: (1) the State breached the plea agreement; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11940 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
claims action.[2] Zurich contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46523 - 2010-02-01
claims action.[2] Zurich contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46523 - 2010-02-01